刘宣如, 刘飞. 庄子三言新论[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版), 2002, 4(4): 112-114.
引用本文: 刘宣如, 刘飞. 庄子三言新论[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版), 2002, 4(4): 112-114.
Liu Xuan-ru, Liu Fei. New Explanation on Zhuangzi’Three Ways of Speech[J]. JOURNAL OF NANCHANG HANGKONG UNIVERSITY(SOCLAL SCIENCES), 2002, 4(4): 112-114.
Citation: Liu Xuan-ru, Liu Fei. New Explanation on Zhuangzi’Three Ways of Speech[J]. JOURNAL OF NANCHANG HANGKONG UNIVERSITY(SOCLAL SCIENCES), 2002, 4(4): 112-114.

庄子三言新论

New Explanation on Zhuangzi’Three Ways of Speech

  • 摘要: 庄子三言历来众说纷纭,莫衷一是.本文在把握庄子大道流行论前提下,紧扣"籍外论之",论述庄子寓言是以体道者和非道化者两类主角的道文,而重言仅是以体道者一类主角的道文,"籍内论之"的卮言是庄子本人体道醉言,但"应""是"论评和"反""非"论评的卮言性质,决定了它不为十九寓言(含十七重言)余下的比例所止限.正基于三言性质的重新解释,庄子三言的道俗两评亦畅然可解.

     

    Abstract: Zhuangzi' Three ways of Speech is an endless debatable problem. Presupposing Zhuangzi' circulation philosophic theory on Dao, this argumention concludes, from "Speaking by Others", Parables is the words roled by both of Learner-from-Dao and Non-Learner-from-Dao, but The Venerables' words only Learner-from-Dao. Meanwhile, Everflowing words,as belonging to "Speaking by Oneself", is one roled by Zhuangzi himself as being Learner-from-Dao, just like a drunker, but the certain comments,such as "For" "Yes" and "Against" "No",being some parts of Everflowing words, build up Everflowing words' proportion more than the remains of Parables (including The Venerables' words). Then, the words of appreciation about Three ways of Speech is very easily understood.

     

/

返回文章
返回