刘傲,王壹. 智能体“离身代理”中的主体性伪造与算法责任重构—基于系统级人机交互权限的现象学考察[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版),2026,28(1):36-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2026.01.005
引用本文: 刘傲,王壹. 智能体“离身代理”中的主体性伪造与算法责任重构—基于系统级人机交互权限的现象学考察[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版),2026,28(1):36-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2026.01.005
LIU Ao,WANG Yi. Subjectivity forgery and reconstruction of algorithmic responsibility in agent-based “disembodied agency”—A Phenomenological Inquiry Based on System-level HCI Permissions [J]. Journal of Nanchang Hangkong University (Social Sciences),2026,28(1):36-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2026.01.005
Citation: LIU Ao,WANG Yi. Subjectivity forgery and reconstruction of algorithmic responsibility in agent-based “disembodied agency”—A Phenomenological Inquiry Based on System-level HCI Permissions [J]. Journal of Nanchang Hangkong University (Social Sciences),2026,28(1):36-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2026.01.005

智能体“离身代理”中的主体性伪造与算法责任重构基于系统级人机交互权限的现象学考察

Subjectivity Forgery and Reconstruction of Algorithmic Responsibility in Agent-based “Disembodied Agency”A Phenomenological Inquiry Based on System-level HCI Permissions

  • 摘要: 系统级智能体向移动终端的嵌入,标志着人机交互范式由“信息中介”向“行动代理”的本体论转型。该技术通过获取操作系统底层的模拟输入权限,实现了对应用沙箱隔离机制的穿透与跨应用行动权的接管,由此引发人机交互中具身性的消解与人类主体性的隐匿。算法不仅生成虚假内容,更在权限俘获、意图偏差与执行黑箱的共同驱动下,生成了可能违背主体初衷却具备合法形式的拟像行动。这种演进诱发了工具理性与价值理性的双重异化,导致数字契约基础与信任体系面临本体论危机。鉴于此,责任重构逻辑应由单边技术阻断转向多边协议共建,通过确立“图灵隔离”识别机制、划定关键交互节点的“具身回归”底线,并推动智能体间通信协议标准化,在算法自动化与人类自主性之间重构可信的责任治理范式。

     

    Abstract: The embedding of system-level agents into mobile terminals marks an ontological transformation of the human-computer interaction (HCI) paradigm from “information intermediary” to “action agency”. By acquiring simulated input permissions at the underlying level of the operating system, this technology achieves penetration of the application sandbox isolation mechanism and the takeover of cross-application action rights, thereby leading to the deconstruction of the human-embodied relationship and the concealment of human subjectivity. Algorithms are no longer limited to generating fake content; driven by the synergy of permission capture, intent deviation, and execution black boxes, they generate “simulacra actions” that may violate the subject’s original intentions but possess legitimate forms. This evolution induces a dual alienation of instrumental rationality and value rationality, leading the foundation of digital contracts and trust systems to an ontological crisis. In view of this, The logic of responsibility reconstruction should shift from unilateral technical blocking to multilateral protocol co-construction. By establishing the “Turing Isolation” identification mechanism, defining the “Return to Embodiment” bottom line for critical interaction nodes, and promoting the standardization of the A2A Protocol, a credible responsibility governance paradigm can be reconstructed between algorithmic automation and human autonomy.

     

/

返回文章
返回