李壮. 西方马克思主义城市理论中的城乡关系问题探析—以列斐伏尔、卡斯特、哈维为中心[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版),2026,28(1):18-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2026.01.003
引用本文: 李壮. 西方马克思主义城市理论中的城乡关系问题探析—以列斐伏尔、卡斯特、哈维为中心[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版),2026,28(1):18-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2026.01.003
LI Zhuang. Urban-rural relations in western marxist urban theory——Focusing on Lefebvre, Castells, and Harvey [J]. Journal of Nanchang Hangkong University (Social Sciences),2026,28(1):18-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2026.01.003
Citation: LI Zhuang. Urban-rural relations in western marxist urban theory——Focusing on Lefebvre, Castells, and Harvey [J]. Journal of Nanchang Hangkong University (Social Sciences),2026,28(1):18-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2026.01.003

西方马克思主义城市理论中的城乡关系问题探析以列斐伏尔、卡斯特、哈维为中心

Urban-rural Relations in Western Marxist Urban Theory—Focusing on Lefebvre, Castells, and Harvey

  • 摘要: 城乡关系问题是马克思主义政治经济学与历史辩证法研究的重要维度。西方马克思主义城市理论学者虽以城市空间批判理论见长,但其理论体系内在地包含了对城乡关系的深刻思考,揭示了资本主义生产方式下城乡关系的历史演变轨迹及其结构性动因。其中,列斐伏尔运用空间辩证法,将城乡关系纳入都市化历史进程予以考察,以其深厚的乡村社会学经验与成熟的空间生产理论,共同构筑了理解资本主义城乡转型的整体性分析框架。卡斯特通过从集体消费到流动空间的理论演进,揭示了信息资本主义时代城乡权力结构的网络化重组机制。哈维则立足资本积累的地理不平衡发展理论,剖析了城乡空间如何成为资本主义危机转移与再生产的结构性场域。当代中国着力构建城乡融合发展新格局的实践诉求,在理论上要求重新审视西方现代化进程中的城乡思想。尽管这些观点脱离了历史科学的总体视野而弱化了马克思的社会革命理论旨趣,但仍然可以为把握中国式现代化进程中的城乡关系及构建中国自主城乡融合发展知识体系提供批判性参考。

     

    Abstract: The urban-rural relationship constitutes a crucial dimension within Marxist political economy and historical dialectics. Whilst Western Marxist urban theorists are renowned for their critique of urban spatial structures, their theoretical frameworks inherently encompass profound reflections on this relationship. These works elucidate the historical trajectory and structural drivers of urban-rural relations under the capitalist mode of production. Among them, Lefebvre employs spatial dialectics to examine urban-rural relations within the historical process of urbanization. His profound experience in rural sociology and mature theory of spatial production jointly construct a holistic analytical framework for understanding capitalist urban-rural transformation. Castells, through his theoretical progression from collective consumption to mobile spaces, exposed the networked restructuring mechanisms of urban-rural power structures in the era of information capitalism. Harvey, grounded in the theory of geographically uneven capital accumulation, dissected how urban-rural spaces function as structural arenas for the transfer and reproduction of capitalist crises. Contemporary China’s practical imperative to forge a new paradigm of integrated urban-rural development necessitates a theoretical re-examination of urban-rural thought within Western modernization processes. Though these perspectives detach from the overarching historical-scientific vision and dilute Marx’s social revolutionary theoretical focus, they nonetheless offer critical reference points for grasping urban-rural relations within China’s modernization trajectory and constructing an autonomous Chinese knowledge system for integrated urban-rural development.

     

/

返回文章
返回