沈志强, 贾淑品. 当代资本主义阶级结构的新变化、原因及实质[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(5): 44-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2025.05.006
引用本文: 沈志强, 贾淑品. 当代资本主义阶级结构的新变化、原因及实质[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(5): 44-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2025.05.006
Zhiqiang SHEN, Shupin JIA. New Changes, Causes and Essence of Contemporary Capitalist Class Structure[J]. JOURNAL OF NANCHANG HANGKONG UNIVERSITY(SOCLAL SCIENCES), 2025, 27(5): 44-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2025.05.006
Citation: Zhiqiang SHEN, Shupin JIA. New Changes, Causes and Essence of Contemporary Capitalist Class Structure[J]. JOURNAL OF NANCHANG HANGKONG UNIVERSITY(SOCLAL SCIENCES), 2025, 27(5): 44-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-8574.2025.05.006

当代资本主义阶级结构的新变化、原因及实质

New Changes, Causes and Essence of Contemporary Capitalist Class Structure

  • 摘要: 二战之后,在科技革命、经济全球化以及资本主义国家自我调节机制等多种因素的共同作用下,当代资本主义阶级结构超越了马克思时代 “资产阶级 — 无产阶级” 的二元对立模式,呈现出技术、金融与全球供应链交织的复杂多维形态。资产阶级内部食利阶层和高级经理人数的增加、传统资本家阶级垄断地位的延续与新兴资本家阶级权力的扩张,工人阶级数量的增长、结构的调整、教育水平与社会地位的提升,中间阶层的新变化以及跨国资产阶级的兴起等,均体现了这一趋势。在此背景下,一些试图解构马克思主义阶级理论的观点,如“阶级主体消失论”和“无产阶级消亡论”等,也陆续出现。然而,深入剖析当代资本主义阶级结构变化的动因与实质后可见,尽管阶级形态发生了一定程度的重构,但当代资产阶级剥削压迫的本质、工人阶级的历史主体地位均未改变,马克思主义阶级理论仍具有深刻的正确性与当代适用性。

     

    Abstract: After World War II, under the joint action of various factors such as scientific and technological revolution, economic globalization, and the self-regulation mechanism of capitalist countries, the contemporary capitalist class structure has surpassed the binary model of mutual opposition between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat in the Marxist era. Instead, it presents a complex “picture” intertwined by technology, finance and global supply chains. The increase in the number of rentier strata and senior managers within the bourgeoisie, the continuation of the monopoly position of the capitalist class and the expansion of the power of the emerging capitalist class, the increase in the number of the working class, the improvement of its structure, education level and social status, the new changes in the middle class, and the rise of the transnational bourgeoisie, etc., all reflect this trend. In this context, some views that try to deconstruct class theory, such as “the theory of the disappearance of class subjects” and “the theory of the extinction of the proletariat”, have also emerged one after another. However, after an in-depth analysis of the motives and essence of the changes in the contemporary capitalist class structure, it can be seen that although the class form has undergone a certain degree of reconstruction, the essence of contemporary bourgeois exploitation and the historical subject status of the working class have not changed. Marxist class theory still has profound correctness and contemporary applicability.

     

/

返回文章
返回