唐豪, 马登科. 论特定继受人程序保障的立法模式[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 20(4): 48-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1912.2018.04.007
引用本文: 唐豪, 马登科. 论特定继受人程序保障的立法模式[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 20(4): 48-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1912.2018.04.007
TANG Hao, MA Deng-ke. The Study of Legislative Mode on Procedural Guarantee of Individuals of the Special Litigation Succeeding[J]. JOURNAL OF NANCHANG HANGKONG UNIVERSITY(SOCLAL SCIENCES), 2018, 20(4): 48-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1912.2018.04.007
Citation: TANG Hao, MA Deng-ke. The Study of Legislative Mode on Procedural Guarantee of Individuals of the Special Litigation Succeeding[J]. JOURNAL OF NANCHANG HANGKONG UNIVERSITY(SOCLAL SCIENCES), 2018, 20(4): 48-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1912.2018.04.007

论特定继受人程序保障的立法模式

The Study of Legislative Mode on Procedural Guarantee of Individuals of the Special Litigation Succeeding

  • 摘要: 基于程序参与和诉讼效率等理论,特定继受人程序保障有其必要。当前特定继受人程序保障的立法模式主要有“当事人恒定主义模式”和“诉讼承继主义模式”两种,虽然存在其他立法模式,但几乎都以此二者作为基础进行损益综合。我国《民事诉讼法解释》出台之后,确立了"当事人恒定主义为原则,诉讼承继主义为例外"的混合主义立法模式,但是仍然存在异议陈述权和程序救济权缺失、诉讼地位不清、善意取得受让人程序保护欠缺等问题,在今后的司法实践中应充分借鉴徳日以及我国台湾地区的先进经验,通过赋予特定继受人程序救济权、多元化的诉讼地位以及善意取得排除既判力主观范围扩张等手段予以完善。

     

    Abstract: Because of procedure participation and lawsuit efficiency, it's necessary to protect of procedural guarantee of individuals of the special litigation succeeding. Now, There are two different viewpoint to privy forever principle and suit acceding principle in theory. Although there are other legislative models, almost all of these two are based on profit and loss synthesis. After China promulgated The Interpretation of The Civil Procedure Law, it establishes the mixed legislative mode of "the principle of the party's constancy, the exception of the suit succession",but there are three questions, such as the existence of the right of dissenting statement and the lack of procedural relief, the position of the lawsuit is not clear,lack of protection procedures for the bona fide acquisition of the assignee and so on. We should learn from the advanced experience of Germany Japan and Taiwan of China in the future judicial practice, perfect it by giving specific successor procedural relief right, pluralistic litigation status and bona fide acquisition to exclude the subjective scope of res judicata.

     

/

返回文章
返回