周银珍. 无前提的断定——路易·阿尔都塞"认识论断裂"解读[J]. 南昌航空大学学报（社会科学版）, 2014, 16(4): 5-10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1912.2014.04.002
引用本文: 周银珍. 无前提的断定——路易·阿尔都塞"认识论断裂"解读[J]. 南昌航空大学学报（社会科学版）, 2014, 16(4): 5-10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1912.2014.04.002
shu
ZHOU Yin-zhen. Conclusion of No Prerequisite——Louis Althusser's "epistemological rupture"[J]. JOURNAL OF NANCHANG HANGKONG UNIVERSITY(SOCLAL SCIENCES), 2014, 16(4): 5-10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1912.2014.04.002
Citation: ZHOU Yin-zhen. Conclusion of No Prerequisite——Louis Althusser's "epistemological rupture"[J]. JOURNAL OF NANCHANG HANGKONG UNIVERSITY(SOCLAL SCIENCES), 2014, 16(4): 5-10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1912.2014.04.002
shu

无前提的断定——路易·阿尔都塞"认识论断裂"解读

Conclusion of No Prerequisite——Louis Althusser's "epistemological rupture"

    摘要
  • 摘要: 马克思主义的人道主义解释涉及的不仅仅是一个普通概念,而是直接关系到马克思主义生死攸关的命运。作为马克思主义者,阿尔都塞对此作出了自卫反击,他提出"认识论断裂"策略,断定已经被误解为人道主义的青年马克思思想并不属于马克思主义,以保卫马克思主义的纯洁性。

     

    Abstract: Humanitarian interpretation of Marxism is not just a general concept involved, it is directly related to the life and death fate of Marxism. As a Marxist, Louis Althusser made a self-defense response that posed "epistemological rupture" strategy and concluded that the thought which had been misinterpreted as a humanitarian ideology of the young Marx did not belong to Marxism,to defend the purity of Marxism. This paper discussed the "epistemological break" without prerequisite.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(5)
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)

/

返回文章
返回