王亮, 刘帅, 王翔. 直流电位法裂纹长度标定技术研究[J]. 失效分析与预防, 2022, 17(2): 96-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6214.2022.02.004
    引用本文: 王亮, 刘帅, 王翔. 直流电位法裂纹长度标定技术研究[J]. 失效分析与预防, 2022, 17(2): 96-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6214.2022.02.004
    WANG Liang, LIU Shuai, WANG Xiang. Study on Crack Length Calibration Technology by Direct Current Potential Method[J]. Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2022, 17(2): 96-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6214.2022.02.004
    Citation: WANG Liang, LIU Shuai, WANG Xiang. Study on Crack Length Calibration Technology by Direct Current Potential Method[J]. Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2022, 17(2): 96-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6214.2022.02.004

    直流电位法裂纹长度标定技术研究

    Study on Crack Length Calibration Technology by Direct Current Potential Method

    • 摘要: 高温合金在400 ℃以上温度进行试验时,材料表面由于氧化或高温热辐射等情况,无法使用基于光学原理的目测法进行疲劳裂纹长度的测量,需要使用直流电位法进行测量。本研究使用直流电位法对紧凑拉伸试样和中心拉伸试样进行裂纹长度测量,解决高温试验条件下,温度、焊点氧化、热电效应对测量结果的影响,并使用勾选法标定直流电位法测量的裂纹长度。结果表明:在标定紧凑拉伸试样和中心拉伸试样时,误差曲线呈线性趋势,紧凑拉伸测量误差在18%以内,中心拉伸试样测量误差在4.3%以内;对比电位法与勾线法的测量结果可知,电位法测量结果均为线性误差,可以通过线性修正获得准确的裂纹长度,从而计算出扩展速率数据。

       

      Abstract: When the test temperature of superalloy materials is above 400 ℃, the visual method based on optical principle cannot be used to measure the fatigue crack length because of oxidation or high-temperature thermal radiation, so the direct current (DC) potential method needs to be used to measure the crack length. This paper introduces the process of measuring the crack length of compact tensile specimens and central tensile specimens by the DC potential method, solving the influence of temperature change, welding spot oxidation and thermoelectric effect on the measurement results under high temperature test condition. The crack length measured by the DC potential method is calibrated by the overload line method. The results show that the error curves show a linear trend when calibrating the compact tensile specimens and the center tensile specimens, the measurement error of the compact tensile specimens is within 18% and the measurement error of the center tensile specimens is within 4.3%. The results measured by the potential method are compared with those measured by the overload line method. The results measured by the potential method have linear errors. The accurate crack length can be obtained by linear correction, and thus the propagation rate data can be calculated.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回